Alien Craft Caught On Film

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by alienpet13 on July 17, 2011 at 12:16am

Not to be a party pooper but I have some experience analyzing UFO footage and here is my assessment of the video clips...

 

0017: Does the fact that the Moon is covered in impact craters mean anything to anyone? What we see in this photo could easily be nothing more than asteroid in decaying orbit around the moon. Could be a UFO but thousands of meteors enter the Earths atmo every single day. In light of that fact, one can expect their to be objects in and around the Moon as well. They would be smart to track this object in order to avoid it on successive orbital passes.

 

0026: Probably just a balloon and a lens flair. The fact that these objects move in a way that suggest being carried by the wind is the first clue. Unfortunately, there is a very short clip of this and we are not seeing the entire flight path, which I suspect shows that the object is just floating with the wind. Balloons of all shapes and sizes are made for promos and such... looks like a big Hot Dog or something but probably not an alien craft.

 

0040: Old NASA footage... the Astronaut (can't remember who) later admitted to using beads of water on a piece of glass to try and make a fake UFO film... our boys just screwing around here.

 

1:03: "Tower of Babel," this is pretty anomalous looking but given the poor image quality, the entire edge of the Moon appears raggety, yet none of these other features are mentioned. It is obvious that the area in question is shrouded in shadows so this could easily just be the edge of a mountain, the rest of which is in the shadows. Still very interesting as there are many, many anomalous photos of "structures" on the Moon and the fact that NASA has admittedly airbrushed details out of photos is quite telling indeed!

 

1:22: Come on now... this is obviously a metal flange that came loose from something. There is a lot of junk floating around in orbit, hoses, wires, hunks of metal, etc. Nothing at all unusual. NASA or the Russians would not dare admit that they lost track of some spare parts in orbit as they would be liable for damages this kind of debris might cause to other satellites... hence, they say it's "unidentified."

 

1:37:  Just because it's the Aurora, doesn't mean birds stop flying in the sky.

 

1:50:  Fake, Fake, Fake!!! This is a STILL PHOTO with a moving object composited in! Note the film grain and hexagonal lens flairs that do not move because this is a static photo. Really lame attempt at a hoax. This clip should not even be in this video.

 

2:00: Another static photo with some fuzz or hairs in the bottom left corner. Either that or scratches on the negative. People make mistakes in dark rooms sometimes. Also could have been a scan or photo of an existing print where scratches or hair was on the print.This could also easily be a wiring harness or more space junk left floating around up there. Remember, the Russians did their space exploration on the cheap and cut a lot of corners budget wise. Also not inconceivable for enemies to put junk up there to interfere with satellites. A bunch of wires attached to a magnet might effectively ruin a satellite.

 

2:16: Again, astronauts fooling around with a bead of water or oil on a pane of glass and moving it around to catch the light. They were trying to make a fake UFO video here, the little rascals! One can very easily see the changes in light refraction as they move the droplet to different angles. This is an admitted hoax by one of our Astronauts.

 

2:44:  Now we're talkin! This has a couple things I look for in authentic UFO video, high speed, quick maneuvering, etc. This might be the real thing!

 

2:54: The pulsating object might easily be a satellite in lower orbit. Many of these satellites spin in order to maintain a stable orientation and the flashing could be due to light reflecting off the surface as it spins. The object is out of focus as the cameras depth of field is that of the station in the foreground, thus, the background object appears as a bright blob. Stil could be a UFO but the above explanation is probably more likely.

 

2:58: Also probably another orbiter or satellite between MIR and the photographer. Note that this film was taken from many, many miles from MIR using a high powered telephoto lens. Telephoto lenses compress distance making foreground objects appear much larger than they really are. You can see this effect in Baseball broadcasts as the pitcher and batter seem the same size even though they are actually 60 feet apart. This is because the camera is waaaay back in the center field bleachers using a tele lens. This could be any small piece of debris or a satellite... there are approx 3000 satellites currently in orbit... it's getting a bit crowded up there and not unheard of for distant cameras to catch these things crossing their line of sight now and again. There are also other debris, such as micro meteors, ice particles, etc... anything spinning and going in a strait line is likely some common types of debris. It's not a crystal clear, ultra clean environment up there... there is lots of "stuff" floatin' around.

 

3:14: OK, sorry to say but this looks like a Photoshop job. NASA is very, VERY selective about releasing photos and has a stringent review policy. I hardly think something like this, if it were real, would slip by their many layers of scrutiny. I would like to see the source for this image as I suspect it has been altered from the original. But there is also the idea that TPTB might want to perpetuate UFO belief to cover their own anti-gravitics tech programs. Could also be a hunk of metal from a broken satellite or other space junk left up there by we humans. Or maybe a UFO but I doubt it.

 

3:21: More junk and pieces of debris. Look people... they don't often bring broken or replaced parts back as this adds weight to the craft. They want to be light as possible on reentry so what happens to the stuff they replace up there? I think there might be a bit of "space littering" going on up there.

 

3:30: Some hoses or wires attached to a metal plate... just more human space junk.

 

3:38: Some panel lights inside the craft or lens flare aberration. Another clip that is so lame it shouldn't be in this compilation.

 

4:14: A shadow moving across the Moons surface that seems to change directions as it goes... very interesting indeed! Another good clip that seems very anomalous! But the question is, are they filming the shadow of their own lander or is this shadow coming from another object. There is also the Command Module still in orbit above them that may be casting this shadow. The apparent movement of the shadow may be result of the lander moving about as it maneuvers. Interesting though.

 

4:51: Interesting anomaly in this shot. Looks like old video tape though which was very prone to pixel flare... keep in mind that there is some radiation up there and some of this old video equipment is not properly shielded. The CCD sensors in these cameras were sensitive to static as well which could cause pixels to become charged. I don't know why the clip ends immediately when the anomaly appears... that is suspicious. And I don't know if this is not just a clip from old, degraded video tape but it is strange none the less. Who knows, could actually be anomalous in nature but I would like to see the entire piece of footage for this one.

 

5:00: Supposed anomalous surface structures showing a pyramid shape or right angle. The image has been heavily enhanced and software designed to do this will sometimes artificially enhance pixels. This is not a reliable image due to that fact. There are roughly strait lines that do appear in nature from broken rock strata, etc, that can appear structured but are completely natural. The square pixel matrix in imaging CCDs also can produce patterned effects when the image is up-sampled. Enhancing and up-sampling cannot produce detail not present in the original image, but are capable of distorting the image in such a way as to be misleading. I don't find this image conclusive at all.

 

5:08: Skylab image... this is from the days of chemical-emulsion film. Seen anomalies like this in regular earth-bound photos as well and to me it looks like a flaw in the original film roll, where a droplet of some chemical landed on the film during manufacture. Not unusual at all for film... there is such a thing as manufacturer defects and the pattern of this looks a lot like some kind of liquid stain pattern present on the original, unexposed film stock.

 

5:11: Same as above explanation... looks like something splattered on several frames of original film stock, or there was a smudge or debris on the celluloid during manufacture.

 

5:17: Audio recording, "Houston we still have the Alien Spacecraft under observance." Hoax made by one of those amateur radio guys who monitor space comms. This has never been actually sourced to NASA or proven to be authentic. Besides, NASA is aware that there are people out their with equipment capable of picking up their coms so they would never openly say "Alien Space Craft," rather, as has been admitted by certain astronauts, they would use code words as they are trained in what to do should they see an ET craft.  Completely fake in every way.

 

5:28: Obviously another piece of space junk... in this case some plastic sheeting. Again, if NASA has "officially classified," this then how's the photo get out to the public? And yet again I point out that it is not in NASA's interest to admit leaving, or losing track of, junk left in orbit, for obvious liability issues. Satellites cost millions to build and launch. If NASA damages one because of trash they left or lost up there, the law suits would be devastating to the program and their public image.

 

5:43: A NASA live feed broadcast on satellite TV. Now if they were tracking a UFO they would NOT have broadcast this! Again, there are 3000+ satellites up there, they are probably just tracking one of them. Bright light from sun reflecting of the surface of the orbital object and a dirty lens makes for this blobby, out of focus image with a tail on it... lens aberrations.

 

6:05: A series of images showing different objects many of which are probably loose hoses, parts, ice particles, etc. Some come into view as they come into the light around the earth... nothing unusual about that. Note that ice particles and small debris close to the camera lens are outside the depth of field and may appear as large blobs. Since there are no depth perception cues in a 2D image, it's hard to judge the size of objects near the camera lens. A nut or a washer a few feet from the lens might be interpreted by the untrained eye as a large object in the distance.

 

6:33: Gemini 4 Reentry... he's probably filming the final launch stage ring of the booster still in orbit. Whatever it is, it appears to be tumbling and free floating and not under intelligent control.

 

6:48: STS 123... now this is something very interesting! I have heard the explanation that these are ice particles but they look to be moving independently, however, depending on the height of the shuttle at the time, we may be looking at several satellites in lower orbits. They are not in real good focus as this is obviously taken from quite some distance with a telephoto lens. The camera is focused on the storm clouds so objects above that distance would appear out of focus as these do. Interesting though.

 

7:00:  STS 75. Amazing clip here! I have no clue what this is and it seems truly anomalous. This is from the famed "Tether Mission" where they dragged a mile-long wire through the earths magnetic field to try and generate electricity. The centrifugal force broke the tether which later seemed to be swarmed by hundreds of these strange objects that look much like the "Dropa Stones" which have turned out to be a probable hoax. Very interesting though as the object appears fairly well defined.

 

7:08: STS 48A... the "missile shot UFO," footage. The official explanation is that ice or debris particle was pushed by the firing of maneuvering thrusters on the shuttle. That is actually the most likely explanation. But if it is a missile, then only if it was launched by a nearby satellite would we see the flash, and conventional liquid or solid fuel missiles do not produce a solitary flash upon launch, rather they produce a constant thruster jet of flame so why would we see any flash at all? Others claim that a particle or laser beam was fired, which makes no sense unless you watch too many scifi movies... light travels at 186 miles per second and you cannot see the beam moving, much less have time to get out of the way by maneuvering... it would appear as a strait line if it were a beam weapon, therefore it is either a missile (in which case there should be no flash) or the official explanation is correct. If it's ice particles then the streak is probably some debris or ice particle that was very close to the thruster shooting away. Objects further away received less kinetic energy and moved less.

 

7:30: Another of these strange "Dropa" objects. Very strange indeed!

 

7:39: STS 48D "The Shape Shifter" ...very ridiculous... this is simply a corrugated hose floating freely, in fact, NASA confirmed this soon after it was filmed. There is no shape-shifting going on, simply the thing is flailing around. In space there is no air friction so slow movement.. if you whip a hose and let it go, it will continue to wiggle. This object is clearly tumbling and out of control, that is unless anyone believes the Aliens fly by letting their ships tumble wildly out of control. And if it was some form of living creature, again, why would it tumble freely out of control like that?

 

8:07: Interesting moving shadows cast on the Moons surface. Astronomers have been seeing stuff like this for years and they are very interesting. I would point out that small objects high above will cast very large shadows on the ground so this could well be asteroids or UFO's. If they are asteroids, then that is kind of scary as if they are sizable, it's a good thing they don't land here. But an asteroid the size of a car will burn up to the size of a pebble by the time it reaches the ground. I will note that many of these Moon shadows have been seen to change directions so this is very compelling and good evidence. Truly anomalous! I can't see this clip really being anything other than an intelligently controlled craft of some sort.

 

8:52: STS 80... one of the best pieces of evidence I've seen. I honestly don't know why NASA allowed this footage to be publicized. Important to note that the black dots at the center of these bright objects are caused by overexposure of the CCD element in the camera. When brightness values reach the upper limit of sensitivity in some older camera sensors, the result is an inability of the firmware to register the brightness value so the pixel values are interpreted as black... this is basically like shorting out the pixels with too much light to the point where they don't register at all and turn themselves off in order to prevent damage to the sensor... so that means these objects are either very bright, or the aperture of the camera is wide open. The objects appear to track behind the shuttle and illuminate one at a time in a circular pattern.  However, it is possible that they are satellites in lower orbit, reflecting the sun off their shiny bodies. Very strange but I'm still a bit skeptical of this one thought I find it very compelling.

 

OK so that's my analysis. I am a UFO believer and don't wish to be viewed as being a debunker but I think it important to know the difference between images that are truly anomalous and ones that are explainable.  Only a couple things worth viewing in this video though but the stand-outs are pretty compelling... the rest is not worth viewing. This whole video could have been reduced to about a minute and a half of the real worthy footage.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The Awakening 2012 on July 17, 2011 at 12:55pm

Thank you to Alien Pet 13,

Your detailed analysis is very welcomed as we all share a common interest to weed out the truth

from that of the false, it's not often that someone can offer such a detailed view upon video content that is submitted by various sources and we do appreciate your time spent regarding your report on the issues you have addressed.

I am also appreciative of the fact that you have been honest enough to point out your status regarding your personal belief relating to the UFO phenomenon in general of which only adds credibility to your findings as it is noted as not being derived from a basis of negativity but infact an honest expose' based upon your personal experience in this field.

I find your efforts most commendable and I share with others when I say, I look forward to any future submissions you may care to put forward,

Ron Arnold   (principal administrator) www.niternat.com

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by alienpet13 on July 17, 2011 at 6:52pm

Thank you Ron!

 

I always tread carefully with things like this but it is good to see someone who understands that my intention is to help people know what to look for. There is a lot out there that can distract from the more compelling and legitimate evidence and I often feel frustrated seeing people believing in stuff that is explainable as it only fuels the skeptics who think many of us UFO believers are gullible fools.

 

There is some really good evidence out there and I hope people keep watching the skies! Hopefully soon, the proof will come out. I certainly think people are ready to handle it now.

 

Thanks again Ron... looking forward to your future posts as well!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by The Awakening 2012 on July 18, 2011 at 4:27pm

The feeling is mutual my friend as we both share in the same task, "keeping it true"

as this can only maintain if not gain the credibility this phenomenon deserves,

Thanks for your response,

 

• ▶ Reply

▶ Reply to Discussion